Support added for RAW images from the DJI Mavic 3 Pro, Air 3, Inspire 3 and Osmo Action models.Support added for RAW images from the Samsung Galaxy S23 series.Support added for RAW images from the Google Pixel 7a.Support added for RAW images from the Pentax K3 Mark III Monochrome and KF.Support added for RAW images from the Fujifilm X-S20.Support added for RAW images from the Leica Q3 and M11 Monochrom.Support added for RAW images from the Sony ILCE-6700, ZV-E1, ZV-1 Mark II and Experia 1 IV.Support added for RAW images from the Nikon Z8.Support added for RAW images from the Canon EOS R8, EOS R50 and EOS R100.Is this a reasonable repair cost? Would you guys pay that much? Also if anyone knows, what would be the approximate resale value of the camera with and without the dead pixel fixed? Not that I'm interested in ever selling my precious X100V, I'm just curious lol. They recently got back to me with the estimate which was $332, plus $23 shipping, and $24.07 taxes so $379.07 in total to get the dead pixel fixed. Unfortunately, I was just over a month outside the one-year warranty, so I sent it in to a Fuji repair location to get a repair estimate, because I wanted to get this fixed so I wouldn't mistake the dead pixel for a piece of dust on the lens or think something was messing up my photos in the future. The dead pixel didn't go away even after pixel mapping the camera in the settings multiple times. It was frustrating because I first thought it was a piece of dust on my lens. Hi. I recently noticed a yellow dead pixel close to the middle of the LCD screen of my X100V (which is in otherwise excellent condition). Have you experimented with the smoother demosaicing option? What's the point of applying the same noise reduction settings to a iso 200 and an iso 3200 image and everything in between? There's another forum with slightly more information available (even the developer of IXT contributing) and I have asked this question there but no answer so far. I also doubt that vignetting and Distortion correction are working as intended - the dng files apart from CA always have a slight vignetting compared to the raf even when the box is ticked in IXT, and distortion is hard to tell, I suppose the lens that I was testing with produces very little distortion anyway but basically there's no difference whether this option is turned on or off. ACR (or Lightroom) does much better in this and the in-camera converter does even better obviously. What is your experience with the Lens Correction / Chromatic Aberration setting? In my testing it did not do much. I have also run some tests with x-t10 files and it seems that we are on the same page here. This is just a base starting point, prior to any further processing, but it makes a freshly converted X file look perfect. Please have a read, and let me know what you think! I think the results are wonderful, but would love to hear others opinions. I was searching everywhere for suggested settings, but it being such a new product I was unable to find any real direction. I did some rather rigorous testing over the past couple of days, to see if I can find an optimal starting point when working with Iridient + Lightroom. I've just written up a new blog post here, outlining the settings I've worked out to get the most out of Iridient Digital's new X-Transformer conversion software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |